Juridical Review of Judicial Considerations in Deciding Tax Criminal Cases (Case Study of Decision No. 582/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel)
Abstract
This study analyzes the judicial review of judge's considerations in deciding tax criminal cases (Case Study of Decision No. 582/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel). The research employs normative legal research methodology. The study utilizes statutory approach and case approach. Data collection method relies on library research. The analysis of legal materials applies prescriptive-normative analytical techniques. The research findings reveal that the application of substantive criminal law in tax criminal case Decision No. 582/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel, specifically the application of substantive law against defendant Hijrah Saputra as stated in the first subsidiary indictment by the public prosecutor, was not appropriately implemented based on the panel of judges' considerations linked to various evidence presented during the trial. The panel of judges ruled that defendant Hijrah Saputra was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing continuous tax crimes as regulated under Law Number 6 of 1983. The legal considerations by judges in imposing sentences incorporated both juridical and non-juridical factors. Juridical considerations examined facts discovered during the trial, including the public prosecutor's indictment, defendant's testimony, witness statements, expert testimony, and evidence. Non-juridical considerations were based on the defendant's background, accountability capacity, and resulting consequences. The panel of judges should have strengthened their considerations, particularly regarding aggravating circumstances.
Article Discovery & Scholarly Lookup
DOIAuthor Biographies
Faculty of Law, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang City, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
Faculty of Law, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang City, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
Faculty of Law, Universitas Nusa Cendana, Kupang City, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
How to Cite
License & Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)Under this license, you are free to:
- Share: copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright and Retention Copyright & Retention Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.References
Total: 20 References- Ashiddiqie, J. (2012). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Rajawali Pers.
- Batistuta, N. S. M. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis penerapan asas lex specialis sistematis dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana perpajakan [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang].
- Delpiro, E., & Rusdiana, E. (2021). Kajian yuridis kewenangan penyidik pegawai negeri sipil pada tindak pidana perpajakan dikaitkan dengan KUHAP. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 8(4), 112-126. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/novum/index
- Dharmasetya, L., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Memaknai tanggung jawab renteng dalam perusahaan terhadap tindak pidana perpajakan. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 5(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v5n2.p1-31
- Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum pidana. PT. Softmedia.
Similar Articles
Explore related articles published in this journal.